다음 글의 요지로 가장 적절한 것을 고르시오. 

In the intricate fabric of metaphysical inquiry, the nature of human autonomy is often interwoven with the capacity for meaningful choice within a framework of existential limitations. While the individual may perceive their decisions as freely chosen, such choices are invariably shaped by an underlying set of societal, psychological, and ontological forces that subtly constrain the breadth of what is possible. This illusion of autonomy, while seemingly liberating, often belies a deeper entanglement with external factors that mold and direct the individual’s capacity to exercise free will.

At the intersection of individual agency and collective influence, the notion of self-determination becomes an intricate dance between the subjective and the structural. The modern individual, in their pursuit of self-realization, often encounters a dichotomy: the pursuit of personal freedom versus the tacit submission to preordained cultural scripts that dictate the contours of their identity. As Heidegger postulated in Being and Time, the individual’s “being-in-the-world” is a situated existence, defined as much by the limitations imposed upon them as by the possibilities they seek to actualize.

Thus, in the grand interplay of autonomy and determinism, one must ask: Is the individual ever truly free? Or do they merely navigate a path already carved by the invisible hand of structural forces, attempting to express autonomy within the confines of preordained boundaries? The individual's capacity to transcend these limitations is not merely a matter of will, but of an existential confrontation with the very nature of their existence.

① 인간의 자율성은 항상 외부의 힘에 의해 제한되며, 이러한 제한을 자각하는 것이 필수적이다.
② 인간은 자신의 정체성을 찾기 위해 스스로 결정을 내릴 자유를 가져야 한다.
③ 사회적 제약을 인식하지 못한 채 자율성을 추구하는 것은 허무함을 초래한다.
④ 개인의 자유 의지는 항상 존재하지만, 그것은 선택의 한계 내에서만 실현된다.
⑤ 자율성의 본질은 사회적 구조에서 벗어나기 위한 끊임없는 투쟁에 있다.